you're reading...
Alternatives Journal, Environment, Federal Politics, Ontario Politics

NDP to refuse support for Rouge National Urban Park bill

Everyone wants the 10,500 acres in the Rouge Valley to be made into a national urban park, yet few but the Harper Tories think their plan for the green space is the best path forward.

Rouge Park at Sunrise. (Flickr Photo Courtesy of Snuffy.)

Rouge Park at Sunrise. (Flickr Photo Courtesy of Snuffy.)

ON A MEDIA TOUR this week of the proposed park on Toronto’s eastern boundary, federal NDP environment critic Megan Leslie (Halifax) told reporters she will advise her caucus to oppose government Bill C-40 despite the personal difficulty she feels in opposing the park.

“I’m in a parallel universe where I get applause for voting against creating a park,” Leslie told a small gathering of environmental stakeholders and media at Hillside Outdoor Education School, located inside the 58-square-km Rouge National Urban Park study area.

After raising concerns with the lack of ecological protections offered in Bill C-40 from Stephen Harper’s Conservative government, this summer Leslie advised her caucus to support the bill at second reading, hoping to make changes in committee.

But it wasn’t to be. The government didn’t bring a single amendment to the Environment Committee debating C-40 on November 5. And opposition amendments from the New Democrats, Liberals and Greens were all rejected by the majority Conservatives who hold the balance of power.

“Everybody was reasonable at committee,” Leslie told reporters this week during her first visit to the park she’s defending in parliament. Farmers and environmentalist alike were willing to work with the government to tweak various aspects of the bill to bolster ecological protection and ensure farmland wasn’t handed over to housing developers. Yet the Tories weren’t interested.

The government wants to paint this as a fight between farmers and environmentalists, Leslie said, but it’s simply not true. “It’s a false tension that’s created by the Conservatives because … it makes it more convenient if they can just steamroll through.”

Leslie’s not alone in her frustration. In an op-ed this week, Green MP Bruce Hyer (Thunder Bay–Superior North) called the government’s actions in committee a “virus of mindless tribalism,” the same herd mentality that has taken over Question Period.

“Most of the Conservatives did not even look up during the debate,” Hyer wrote, “keeping their eyes glued on their Blackberrys as they stubbornly refused every bipartisan attempt to improve ecological protection in the park.”

Without managing to improve the bill in committee, Leslie told reporters she now faces the difficult choice of recommending against a bill creating a park in a part of Canada badly in need of dedicated parkland.

Rouge Park Map

Map of the proposed Rouge National Urban Park.

“I think we’re going to have to” vote against it, Leslie said. “Talking to stakeholders who are here today, realizing what a precedent this could set for other parks across Canada, I think it’s where we are going to fall. That recommendation will come later this week.”

What worries Leslie and environmental groups alike is the flimsy commitment to protect the ecological integrity of the park the Tories have written into the bill. While legislation governing other national parks in Canada say the Minister of the Environment has to protect the park’s ecology, Bill C-40 says the Minister must “take into consideration the protection of its natural ecosystems.” The distinction is slim, but significant.

In September, the Ontario government — which owns two-thirds of the land to become part of the park — signalled their refusal to hand over any land unless the Tories make a move to address the concerns of environmental groups and opposition MPs.

This week, a coalition of six of the country’s top environmental NGOs including the David Suzuki Foundation, Environmental Defence, Ontario Nature and Nature Canada penned an open letter to all members of parliament calling on them to reject C-40.

“A more robust legislative framework is needed to ensure Canada’s first urban national park will adequately protect the Rouge – an amazing national treasure – for Canadians today and into the future,” the letter states. And without the Ontario government lands in the mix, the Tories risk creating a park “in name only.”

For Jim Robb, general manager of Friends of the Rouge Watershed, this is nothing but greenwashing. The Tories are looking for “green” legislation to point to in the 2015 federal election to deflect attention away from their abysmal environmental record, Robb told reporters on the media tour this week.

Read the full article at Alternatives Journal.

About awreeves

Editor-in-chief at Alternatives Journal. Author of 'Overrun: Dispatches from the Asian carp Crisis'.


One thought on “NDP to refuse support for Rouge National Urban Park bill

  1. The whole process is still largely closed to the public. They say they have involved people and many organizations in the process, which is only partly true. Attending a massive public meeting does not allow for any meaningful input. They also have not said or illustrated how they have addressed any concerns in the development of the management plan. Larger concerns about the Act itself are not even open for debate or change. There is no real communication or partnership development with any of the NGO’s involved in the Park. The ones that work to get it protected in the first place and who have spent millions of dollars over the years. The unfortunate part is that FRW are the ones that lobbied and promoted this becoming a National Park in the first place. Meanwhile the species and habitats here continue to decline in quality and quantity. It is very likely that a National Park is not the answer to the issues faced here. Another model is needed one that is bottom up and not top down. Perhaps a real people’s park. One run by the “people”.

    Posted by Robert | November 19, 2014, 2:31 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to reeves report and receive new posts in your inbox.

reeves report archives

%d bloggers like this: